Updates from the sofa

What the Corie Walsh court record says about the Lindsay Clancy connection, the reported group-chat shift, and the defense claims involving psychosis.

The Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial, then the jurors and the lone holdout became the story. Paul examines the viral spectators, unsupported Patrick Clancy theories, juror interviews and the legal questions still unresolved.

Rebecca H. Jollotta and Julie Paul are asking for a medical malpractice tribunal in Lindsay Clancy’s civil lawsuit. Here’s what their filing argues, how they answer the plaintiff expert’s allegations, and why the tribunal is not a final malpractice ruling.

Testimony from Dr. Elizabeth Laposata and Dr. Paul Zeizel addressed several of the most controversial questions surrounding the Lindsay Clancy case—but explaining a medical mechanism is not necessarily the same as proving the complete timeline.

The Lindsay Clancy psychiatrist testimony put telehealth, medication decisions, risk assessments, and provider communication under scrutiny. Here is what Dr. Jennifer Tufts’s cross-examination showed—and what it did not prove.

GiGi joins Paul for a careful two-case conversation about the Lindsay Clancy trial, the Mackenzie Shirilla case, and the line between evidence, legal outcomes, and creator commentary.

Dr. Jennifer Tufts is pushing back against the malpractice claims in Lindsay Clancy’s civil lawsuit and asking for a Massachusetts medical malpractice tribunal to review the case against her.

Day 12 of the Lindsay Clancy trial raised a dramatic coaching theory. Here’s what Sgt. Dan Lawlor’s testimony established—and what it did not.

Medical testimony, blood evidence, journal entries, and the bedroom window dominated Days 5 and 6 of the Lindsay Clancy trial. Here’s what stood out.

Not Carol explores the tragic Carol Coronado case, postpartum mental health, the insanity defense, and the warning signs her family recognized too late.